Bedford v. Riello
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Long
The essential question presented in this appeal is whether the adjustment of an this case a within the permitted scope of chiropractic practice under New Jersey law. More particularly, the issue is whether adjustment of a knee is within the contemplation of N.J.A.C. which allows for chiropractic manipulation of the “articulations of the spine and related structures.” The trial judge held, as a matter of law, that a knee is always a “related structure” under the rule. The Appellate Division disagreed concluding, also as a matter of law, that a knee can never be considered a “related structure”…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- Frugis v. BraciglianoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- Crema v. New Jersey Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Malone v. FenderSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Burnett v. County of BergenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
- US Bank, N.A. v. HoughSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
- State v. MarquezSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
- In Re Referendum on City of Trenton Ordinance 09-02Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
- Nini v. Mercer County Community CollegeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.