Legal Opinion

Bedford v. Riello

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 18, 2008No. A-48 September Term, 2007PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Long

The essential question presented in this appeal is whether the adjustment of an this case a within the permitted scope of chiropractic practice under New Jersey law. More particularly, the issue is whether adjustment of a knee is within the contemplation of N.J.A.C. which allows for chiropractic manipulation of the “articulations of the spine and related structures.” The trial judge held, as a matter of law, that a knee is always a “related structure” under the rule. The Appellate Division disagreed concluding, also as a matter of law, that a knee can never be considered a “related structure”…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  2. Frugis v. BraciglianoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
  3. State v. BrownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  4. Crema v. New Jersey Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  5. Malone v. FenderSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Burnett v. County of BergenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
  2. US Bank, N.A. v. HoughSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
  3. State v. MarquezSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
  4. In Re Referendum on City of Trenton Ordinance 09-02Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
  5. Nini v. Mercer County Community CollegeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API