Legal Opinion

Crema v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 1, 1983PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

HANDLER, J.

Historic Smithville Development Corporation (HSDC) sought to construct a large scale residential and commercial development in an environmentally sensitive area governed by the Coastal Area Facility Review Act, N.J.S.A. 13:19-1 to -21 (CAFRA). It applied to the New Jersey State Department of Environmental Protection (Department or DEP) for a permit authorizing the development. DEP ultimately granted a permit approving only the “concept” of the development. The permit did not authorize or allow any actual construction until all prescribed…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Wyman-Gordon Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. RuckelshausCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  5. Cunningham v. Department of Civil ServiceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Metromedia, Inc. v. Director, Division of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. CBS Inc. v. Comptroller of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  3. Holmdel Builders Ass'n v. Township of HolmdelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  4. Bedford v. RielloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
  5. Application of Hawaiian Electric Co., Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1996

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API