Legal Opinion

Lindsey v. Hamlet

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 27, 1936No. 5 Div. 228PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

The appellants, to state the substance of the bill’s averments, allege that they are the owners of the lands described in the bill, consisting of 245 acres situated on the west side of the Tallapoosa river in Tallapoosa county, Ala.; that on the 16th day of December, 1931, they executed to the defendant T. J. Hamlet a deed absolute in form to said lands to secure the payment of an indebtedness of $439.25, then and there contracted to procure money to pay a past-due installment on a mortgage held by the Federal Land Bank of New Orleans and prevent a foreclosure of said mortgage;…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  2. Lewis v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  3. Silverstein v. First Nat. Bank of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  4. Worthington v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
  5. Irwin v. ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jarrett v. HagedornSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  2. Lindsey v. HamletSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  3. Ex parte MarkleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  4. Holloway v. HollandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API