Legal Opinion

Ex parte Markle

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 14, 1956No. 5 Div. 595PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPANN, Justice.

Petitioner, defendant below, seeks a writ of mandamus requiring Honorable Will O. Walton, as Associate Judge of the Fifth Judicial Circuit, to vacate an order which directed defendant to answer interrogatories 2, 3, 8 and 9 propounded to him by the plaintiff. The cause was submitted here on briefs on the petition and respondent’s answer thereto.

Plaintiff, Auburn Insurance Agency, Inc., sued defendant on two promissory notes. Count 2 of the complaint claimed $3,052.47, the face of one of the notes, plus an attorney’s fee. We do not describe the note sued on in count 1, because…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte PollardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. Ex Parte DriverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  3. Ex parte WoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  4. Lindsey v. HamletSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  5. State Ex Rel. Everett v. Board of School Com'rsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smith v. FlynnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  2. Ex Parte Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  3. Ex Parte Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  4. Ex parte Radiology, P.C. v. Management & Business Advisors, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  5. Nelson v. Darling Shop of Birmingham, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API