Legal Opinion

People v. Davis

California Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1967No. Crim. 9735PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

Consideration of these appeals was deferred to await the decision of this court in People v. Rollins, 65 Cal.2d 681 [56 Cal.Rptr. 295, 423 P.2d 221], to determine whether the rules announced in Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 [12 L.Ed.2d 977, 84 S.Ct. 1758], and Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 [16 L.Ed.2d 694, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 10 A.L.R.3d 974], were to be applied, wholly or partially, retroactively, or were to be applied prospectively in accordance with the rules announced for the federal courts in Johnson v. New Jersey, 384 U.S. 719 [16 L.Ed.2d 882, 86 S.Ct. 1772]. The Rollins case, supra,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. People v. ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. People v. SamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. People v. RandallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. People v. CharlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. People v. MorseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API