Shankle v. Ingram
Supreme Court of North Carolina
ActioN by Eli SbanMe against E. N. Ingram and E. P. Ingram, beard by Judge O. H. Allen and a jury, at March Term, 1903, of the Superior Court of Richmond County. Erom a judgment for the defendants the plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.
This is an action to recover damages for the breach of covenants in a deed. Plaintiff alleges in his complaint that in 1888 the defendants conveyed to him a tract of land in Richmond County containing 245 acres, being the lot set apart to Nannie Leak in the division of a larger tract. That the deed contained covenants of warranty and seizin in the usual form, and that at the time of the execution of the deed the defendants were not the owners of the entire premises, as they had in the year 1881 conveyed 41.8 acres of the land to one Jessie Reynolds, and that the plaintiff has not been…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Phillips Walsh v. . Rufus D. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
- McKee, Sheriff v. . LinebergerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
- Sloan v. Carolina Central RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
- Price v. . DealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
- Anderson v. . RaineySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dippold v. Cathlamet Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Fields v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Newbern v. . HintonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Brock v. . ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Caperna v. Williams-Bauer Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.