Legal Opinion
Huggins v. Teamsters Local 312
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 14, 1984No. Civ. A. 82-2005PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KELLY, District Judge.
Presently before the court is defendant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 56(b). Defendant contends there are, after the completion of discovery, no remaining genuine issues of material fact in this litigation.
Penn Truck Aids, Inc. (PTA) is engaged in the business of supplying truck drivers to various customers on an independent contractor basis. Two types of drivers are supplied. Casual drivers are assigned to drive for PTA’s customers on a temporary, as needed, basis. Regular drivers are assigned to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Clayton v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Robin Construction Company, a Corporation of New Jersey, Richard D. Masia and Judith Masia v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ferron v. WestDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1998
- Murman v. Renold Power Transmission Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1985