(PC) Fletcher v. Clendenin
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALLAN FLETCHER, No. 2:23-CV-0229-DMC-P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 ROXANNE GONZALEZ, and 15 Defendant. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 16 17 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Defendant’s unopposed motion to dismiss. See ECF 19 No. 22. 20 In considering a motion to dismiss, the Court must accept all allegations of 21 material fact in the complaint as true. See Erickson v. Pardus,
551 U.S. 89, 93-94
(2007).…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.