Legal Opinion

(PC) Fletcher v. Clendenin

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 21, 2025No. 2:23-cv-00229Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALLAN FLETCHER, No. 2:23-CV-0229-DMC-P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 ROXANNE GONZALEZ, and 15 Defendant. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 16 17 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Defendant’s unopposed motion to dismiss. See ECF 19 No. 22. 20 In considering a motion to dismiss, the Court must accept all allegations of 21 material fact in the complaint as true. See Erickson v. Pardus,

551 U.S. 89, 93-94

(2007).…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API