Legal Opinion

In Re MacDonnell's Estate

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1936No. 3130Published

1Opinion

As a matter of fact appellant, Ross Burke Co., did urge the ground of estoppel in the lower court. It was there presented, argued, briefed and submitted. That this was done in the lower court will doubtless be conceded by respondent.

When exempt property is set aside under the provisions of sec. 9700 N.C.L., it does not go to the family in common or undivided shares. Each member of the family takes a definite and specific portion. Sec. 9703 N.C.L. Hence, in the case at bar one half of the exempt property so set aside would belong to the widow, and the other half to the minor child. On the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sharon v. MinnockNevada Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Phelps v. PhelpsIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Estate of WalleyNevada Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Webb v. StillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Farmers & Merchants National Bank v. Eureka Land & Stock Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API