Legal Opinion

Royal Ins. v. All States Theatres, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 19, 1942No. 7 Div. 668PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The complaint was not subject to demurrer. The use of the expression in the complaint “in the policy of insurance” imports that it was a written and not a verbal contract, and founded on a valuable consideration. Travelers’ Ins. Co. v. Whitman, 202 Ala. 388, 80 So. 470; Prudential Casualty Co. v. Kerr, 202 Ala. 259, 80 So. 97.

With commendable judgment, appellee’s counsel observes of the two hundred assignments of error that they will be considered in the same order in which they have been discussed in brief of counsel for appellant. This court will, in like manner, attempt to…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. David Lupton's Sons Co. v. Automobile Club of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Farrior v. New England Mortgage Security Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  3. Beard v. Union & American Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  4. Sullivan v. Sullivan Timber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  5. Chattanooga National Building & Loan Ass'n v. DensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1903

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lash v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  2. Sar Manufacturing Co. v. Dumas Bros. Mfg.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  3. Loudonville Milling Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  4. Lash v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1943
  5. Smith v. Penn Mut. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API