Woodley v. Calhoun
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Gary, J., Marlboro, November, 1903. Action by Jno. A. Woodley, admr. of Mary A. Woodley, against Archibald L. Calhoun, sr., trustee, Legare S. Calhoun et al. From Circuit decree, Hattie Woodley appeals. cites: 18 S. C., 47; Dud. Eq., 201; 11 Rich. Eq., 527; 12 S. C., 172; 27 S. C., 479; 44 S. C., 503. cite: 67 S. C., 130; 23 S. C., 512; 10 S. C., 386; 26 S. C., 450; 12 Rich. Eq., 114; 22 S. E. R., 831; 1 Hill Eq., 311.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Gary.
This appeal raises the question whether those persons named in the deed of trust hereinafter mentioned took as vested or contingent remaindermen.
The facts are thus set out in the decree of his Honor, the Circuit Judge: “Mary A. Woodley, being the owner in fee of a certain tract of land, on the 2d day of December, 1897, made to Archibald L. Calhoun, sr., a formal deed of conveyance thereto with habendum to him, his heirs and assigns, ‘in trust, nevertheless, for my sole use, benefit and behoof, for and during the term of my natural…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Brown v. McCallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1895
- Gourdin v. DeasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1887
3Cited by7 opinions
- Walker v. AlversonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
- Pearson v. EasterlingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1917
- Gist v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
- PEOPLES NAT'L BANK OF GREENVILLE v. HableSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
- Tindal v. RichbourgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.