Legal Opinion

Tindal v. Richbourg

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 15, 1912No. 8207PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Before Shipp, J., Clarendon. Action by Alexander Tindal et al. against Willie A. Bichbonrg et al. Defendant J. H. Rigby appeals. cite: 16 S. C. 227, 290; 20 S. C. 318; 21 S. C. 529; 12'S. C. 172; 15 S. C. 432; 16 S. C. 220; 17 S. C. 53; 23 S. C. 225; 26 S. C. 462. cites: 16 S. C. 228; 24 S. C. 314; 1 McC. 7; 2 McC. 256, 411; 1 Hill Ch. 311; 15 Strob. Eq. 283; 4 Strob. Eq. 15; 4 Rich. Eq. 346; 5 Rich. Eq. 30; 7 Rich. Eq. 125; 9 Rich.

Read the full summary

Before Shipp, J., Clarendon. Action by Alexander Tindal et al. against Willie A. Bichbonrg et al. Defendant J. H. Rigby appeals. cite: 16 S. C. 227, 290; 20 S. C. 318; 21 S. C. 529; 12'S. C. 172; 15 S. C. 432; 16 S. C. 220; 17 S. C. 53; 23 S. C. 225; 26 S. C. 462. cites: 16 S. C. 228; 24 S. C. 314; 1 McC. 7; 2 McC. 256, 411; 1 Hill Ch. 311; 15 Strob. Eq. 283; 4 Strob. Eq. 15; 4 Rich. Eq. 346; 5 Rich. Eq. 30; 7 Rich. Eq. 125; 9 Rich. Eq. 470; 19 S. C. 350; 25 S. C. 361, 292; 24 S. C. 314; 23 S. C. 224; 2 Strob. Eq. .51; Rich. Eq. 464.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chirp Justicr Gary.

This is ah action for partition, ánd involves the construction of a will.

On the 28th of April, 1902, Amzi Tindal departed this life; leaving in full force and effect his last will and testament, which contained these provisions: “I give, devise and bequeath all of my property, both real and personal of whatsoever kind, that I am now or may be at the time of my decease ‘possessed,’ to my beloved wife, Winnie Tindal, for her sole use and benefit, during her natural life. -

2.- “That after the death of my wife, Winnie Tindal, I…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rutledge v. FishburneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
  2. Brown v. McCallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1895
  3. Brantley v. BittleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
  4. Woodley v. CalhounSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1904

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Black v. HarmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  2. First Nat'l Bank of Holly Hill v. BennettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
  3. Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. WoodDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API