Legal Opinion

PEOPLES NAT'L BANK OF GREENVILLE v. Hable

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 11, 1964No. 18166PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brailsford, Justice.

This is an action to construe the will of Hyman.Endel, who died testate in 1925. We quote those clauses of the 1922 will pertaining to testator’s residuary estate, a part of which is in controversy:

“11TH: All of the rest and residue of my estate, both real and personal, I give, bequeath and devise as follows: one-half (J4) thereof to my wife Frances Endel and one-fourth (}i) thereof to my daughter Hortense Riesenfeld, said shares to be the absolute property of my said wife and said daughter.
“12TH: The remaining one-fourth (J4) of the residue of my estate I will, bequeath…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Doe v. ConsidineSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  2. Walker v. AlversonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
  3. Rogers v. ROGERSSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
  4. Brown v. McCallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1895
  5. Gourdin v. DeasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. HOLCOMBE-BURDETTE v. Bank of AmericaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
  2. Loadholt v. HarterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
  3. Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. WoodDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API