Legal Opinion
Jones v. Protection Mut. Fire Ins. of Cambria
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 23, 1951No. Civ. Nos. 9325, 9327PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOLLMER, District Judge.
This case was tried before the Court and without a jury, with judgment in favor of the plaintiff. 93 F.Supp. 505. Defendants have moved for a new trial and judgment N.O.V.
Counsel for defendants commence their brief with a tirade upon the insurance situation in Missouri. There is no evidence pertinent thereto in this action, nor is it material.1 Suffice it to say that defendants did choose to issue a considerable number of policies on property, both real and personal, in Missouri. Counsel takes umbrage at the fact that 'the Court did not discuss the general law…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pearl Assurance Co. v. National Insurance Agency, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Jones v. Commonwealth Mut. Fire Ins.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
- Presson v. Commonwealth Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mathews v. Marquette Casualty CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
- St. Louis Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. WitneyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
- Flynn v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Booker Bros. v. American Casualty Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1971
- Jones v. Protection Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.