Legal Opinion

Pearl Assurance Co. v. National Insurance Agency, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 15, 1941No. Appeals, 112 and 116PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This was an action of trespass brought by an insurance company against a corporate insurance broker— which seems to have been a ‘one-man’ corporation — and the ‘one-mán’ individual who was its president, and himself performed all the acts complained of, for the recovery of some twenty-two hundred dollars damages, sustained by the plaintiff in consequence of the alleged unlawful conversion by them of the net premiums on certain insurance policies, which had been intrusted to them by plaintiff for the purpose of delivering the policies and collecting the premiums from the insured or…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Stehle v. Jaeger Automatic Machine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  2. Gosch v. Firemen's InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  3. Bobereski, Adm. v. Ins. Co. of Pa.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Rebel v. Standard Sanitary Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Stehle v. Jaeger Automatic Machine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. D'AMBROSIO v. Pa. Nat. Mut. Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Belford Trucking Co. v. ZagarDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  3. Odell v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
  4. Pearl Assurance Co. v. National Insurance Agency, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. D'ERRICO v. DeFazioSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API