Williams v. Imperial Eastman Acquisition Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BUCKLO, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, Roosevelt Williams and Roman Candir are suing defendant, Imperial Eastman Acquisition Corporation (“Imperial”), for age discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. Mr. Candir also alleges disability discrimination in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Imperial now moves for summary judgment on the merits of the claims, or in the alternative, on the plaintiffs’ claims for back pay and/or front pay. For the reasons set…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- John T. Russell v. Acme-Evans Company, Adm Milling Company, and Archer-Daniels-Midland CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Hubert Wooten v. Farmland FoodsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Stephen N. Roth, M.D. v. Lutheran General Hospital, Jerome Kraut, M.D., Seymour Metrick, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Mary Ellen Byrne v. Board of Education, School of West Allis-West MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ortega v. Chicago Board of EducationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
- Bricker v. Federal-Mogul Corp.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1998
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Keystone RV CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2024