Legal Opinion

Bricker v. Federal-Mogul Corp.

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided November 18, 1998No. IP 98-396 C B/SPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ENTRY GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

BARKER, Chief Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiff claims that Defendant wrongfully discharged him in retaliation for Plaintiffs refusing to falsify certain maintenance records. Defendant contends that Plaintiff has not alleged that he falls within one of the narrow exceptions to Indiana’s employment-at-will doctrine and thus his claim is not cognizable. For the reasons set forth below, we…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Frampton v. Central Indiana Gas CompanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Dawson v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  5. Carl Sandburg Village Condominium Association No. 1, Plaintiffs v. First Condominium Development Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API