Loop v. Peerless Serum Company
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
PRITCHARD, Commissioner.
Plaintiff, George A. Lopp, for breach of an employment contract, sought by the alternative remedy of restitution the value of certain corporate assets (formulas for veterinary pharmaceutical products, ideas and the name of the Peerless Serum Company, which is hereinafter called “Old Peerless”). Mr. Lopp had transferred the corporate assets pursuant to a contract with the Anchor Serum Company of Missouri to the newly formed Peerless Serum Company (hereinafter called “New Peerless”).
Trial was to a jury which returned a verdict for plaintiffs against both defendants in…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lowendahl v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Majestic Co. v. Orpheum Circuit, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Schwartz v. Shelby Construction CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
- Banta v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- Harrington v. Kansas City Cable Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1895
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kisling v. MFA Mutual Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
- Patel v. PateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- Kim v. Conway & Forty, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- Panther v. Mr. Good-Rents, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Burden v. Hummel (In Re Hummel)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.