Legal Opinion

State v. Lee

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 4, 1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Hamilton District Court. — IIoN. D. R. HiNdmaN, Judge. Defendant was indicted, tried, and convicted of the crime of breaking and entering a building where goods, wares, and merchandise were kept for use, sale, and deposit, and he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.

*4281 *427I. Defendant moved to set aside the indictment because the grand jury finding the same was not summoned and drawn according to law, in that *428First, the said grand jury was not selected from seventy-five names as the law requires; second, the lists from which selection was made did not include names from one of the wards, in Webster City, and no provision was made therefor. No evidence was introduced in support of this motion. The abstract contains this statement: “Reference is hereby made to bill of exceptions in the State vs. John Littleton, part of the records of this court.” Then follows…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. RiversSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  2. State v. TeeterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  3. State v. EmmonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  4. State v. GoldenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
  5. State v. CraigSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. McCraySupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  2. State v. BurnsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  3. State v. PorterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API