State v. Teeter
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Clayton District Court. The defendant was convicted of the crime of burglary, and sentenced to a term of imprisonment in the penitentiary, and from that judgment he appeals to this court.
1Opinion of the CourtPeed, J.
*7181. BURGLARY: evidence as entering. *717-I. The indictment charges that the defendant, in the night-time, broke and entered a building owned and *718occupied by Frederick Saunders, in which goods, L ./ ' 0 ’ wares and merchandise and things of value were kept for saie and deposit, with intent to commit the crime of larceny. There was evidence which warranted the jury in finding that the defendant did,'on the night of the. eighth of September, 1883, enter the building described in the indictment, through a window, which he opened for that purpose. The building was occupied and used as a saloon by the…
2Cited by19 opinions
- State v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
- State v. BrandenbergerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- State v. WatsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- State v. WorthenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
- State v. MecumSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.