State v. Golden
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Clarke District Court. ' The defendants were indicted for the crime of breaking into a store-room with intent to commit the crime of larceny. There was a verdict of guilty, judgment, and defendants, appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtSeevers, J.
I. The defendant asked the court to instruct the jury as follows:
1. criminal law: recent possession. “3. When goods were stolen in connection with the crime of breaking into a building, possession of such goods immediately after the crime of breaking into the building was committed, without other evidence of guilt, would not be sufficient to convict the party or parties in possession of such goods.”
This was refused and the following given:
"9. If parties are found in possession of goods recently stolen by breaking into a store-room, and which have been stolen by breaking into a store-room, it…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. WaltersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
- Commonwealth v. McGortyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- State v. ReidSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
- State v. MorrisseySupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
- Higgins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. JenningsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
- State v. KingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- State v. IrelandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- State v. ShortSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
- State v. BurnsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.