Legal Opinion

Verhalen v. Nash

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 1, 1959No. 7156PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FANNING, Justice.

James T. Nash, Jr., a minor, and his father, James T. Nash, Sr., in a trial before a jury upon special issues, recovered judgment against Steve George Verhalen, Jr., for damages resulting from a collision between the motor scooter of James T. Nash, Jr., and the automobile of Steve George Verhalen, Jr. All the liability issues were found in favor of the Nashes, appellees herein, and against appellant Ver-halen, Jr. The jury in response to special issue No. 7 found James T. Nash, Jr., to have been damaged in the amount of $10,-000 and in response to special issue No. 6 found…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. McIver v. GloriaTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. HarriettTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Dallas Consolidated Electric Street Railway Co. v. MotwillerTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Fisher v. Coastal Transport Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1950

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Haught v. MaceluchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  2. Brown v. Robinson, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1988
  3. A. H. Bull Steamship Co., Inc. v. Egbert LigonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
  4. Kingham Messenger & Delivery Service, Inc. v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  5. Boddy v. CanteauCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API