Legal Opinion

Boddy v. Canteau

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 7, 1969No. 14747PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KLINGEMAN, Justice.

Suit for damages by Joseph Canteau, herein referred to as plaintiff, against Roy Boddy, herein referred to as defendant, for injuries sustained when a car being driven by plaintiff was struck from the rear by a car being driven by defendant. Trial was to a jury who found that defendant failed to keep such a lookout as a person of ordinary prudence would have kept under the same or similar circumstances, and that such failure was a proximate cause of the collision in question; that defendant failed to apply the brakes of his automobile in such a manner and at such time as a…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Aultman v. Dallas Railway & Terminal Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Lynch v. RickettsTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Dallas Railway & Terminal Co. v. BaileyTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  4. TEXAS EMPLOYERS'INS. ASS'N v. HaywoodTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Dennis v. HulseTexas Supreme Court · 1962

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hammond v. StricklenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  2. Vandyke v. Austin Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. B. M. & R. Interests v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  5. Sheppard, in ReTexas Special Court of Review · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API