Legal Opinion
Long v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided July 30, 2003No. A108952PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.
Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (board) designating him as a predatory sex offender and establishing the conditions of his parole. We uphold the condition of parole that he challenges but reverse the board’s predatory sex offender designation and remand for further proceedings.
Before turning to petitioner’s arguments, we describe briefly the applicable statutory and regulatory framework. Pursuant to ORS 181.585, the board determines whether persons convicted of certain sex offenses should be designated as predatoiy sex offenders. In…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- MacKey v. MontrymSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Connecticut Department of Public Safety v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Delgado v. SoudersOregon Supreme Court · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Casillas v. GerstenfeldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026