Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Long v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 30, 2003No. A108952Published

1ConcurrenceEdmonds, P. J.

I agree with the majority s opinion that we are bound by this court’s decision in V. L. Y. v. Board of Parole, 188 Or App 617, 72 P3d 993 (2003). I therefore join with the majority opinion. However, I write separately to note that the effect of this court’s majority opinion in V. L. Y. is to reject petitioner’s arguments that he is entitled to a predetermination hearing in the event that the board determines that the facts that it *64relies on to designate him as a predatory sex offender are derived from his criminal history. In other words, it is possible that on remand the board, under our…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. V. L. Y. v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API