Legal Opinion

Louden v. Martindale

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1896PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Alpena; Kelley, J. Bill by James S. Louden and others against Martha Martindale and others to set aside an administratrix’s sale. From a decree for complainants, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

January 22, 1877, John Louden, a resident of Alpena county, died, leaving a widow, Sarah A. Louden, and four children, aged respectively: James S. Louden, 15 years; Andrew B. Louden, 9 years; John L. Louden, 7 years; Sarah A. Louden (now Foster), aged 10 months. These four children are the complainants.

February 5, 1877, the widow petitioned to be made administratrix of the estate, and was appointed administratrix February 28, 1877, and gave a bond which was approved by the judge of probate. Afterwards debts were allowed against the estate, to the amount of $2,400. Appraisers were appointed.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Showers v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  2. McKay v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Drake v. KinsellMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Griffin v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Winter v. TruaxMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Charles v. Roxana Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922
  2. Bopst v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  3. In re Emmons' EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API