Legal Opinion
Umstead v. Durham Hosiery Mills, Inc.
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided January 26, 1984No. C-83-1168-DPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HIRAM H. WARD, Chief Judge.
Before the Court is defendants’ pre-Answer Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (October 31, 1983) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), (6). (November 22, 1983). Defendants have requested a hearing, but .the Court finds that a hearing would not aid resolution of this matter. The Court will deny the Motion, but will require plaintiff to file a more definite statement in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(e).
For purposes of this Motion, the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Adams v. BainCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. National Securities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- In Re Integrated Resources Real Estate Ltd. Partnerships Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Lindner v. Durham Hosiery Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- Alfaro v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
- Kronfeld v. First Jersey National BankDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
- Jadoff v. GleasonDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.