Legal Opinion
Maudie Weaver and Harold v. Weaver v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 9, 1964No. 7563_1PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Circuit Judge.
Appellants, Maudie Weaver and her husband, brought separate suits in the court below against appellee, under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 1 to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly received by her in a fall that occurred on property owned by the United States. The cases were consolidated and tried to the court, resulting in a judgment in favor of the United States, and this appeal followed.
In February, 1959, the United States acquired an option to purchase a tract of real estate located in Mannford, Oklahoma, for the purpose of constructing the Keystone Reservoir…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- City of Tulsa v. HarmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Henry Alaniz, Administrator of the Estate of Elias Alaniz, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. BarnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- United States v. Frederick K. GregoryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Joan Laverne Henderson, Omarie Henderson, Sharon Marie Hass, and James F. Henderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. SommersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- Beesley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
- Southwestern Investment Company, a Corporation v. Cactus Motor Company, Inc., a Corporation, and Parker CullomCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
- Beesley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.