Legal Opinion

Beesley v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 27, 1966No. 8289PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

364 F.2d 194

Mary S. BEESLEY and Hiram L. Beesley, Appellants,

v.

UNITED STATES of America, their agency, the United States Department of Agriculture, Edward Daniel Barnes and George Sites, Appellees.

No. 8289.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

July 27, 1966.

J. Hugh Hernden, Midwest City, Okl., for appellants.

Robert L. Berry, Asst. U. S. Atty. (B. Andrew Potter, U. S. Atty., Western District of Oklahoma, with him on the brief), for appellees.

Before BREITENSTEIN, HILL and SETH, Circuit Judges.

SETH, Circuit Judge.

1

Appellants, Mary S. Beesley and Hiram L. Beesley, brought suit in the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. City of Okmulgee v. HemphillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Porter v. Norton-Stuart Pontiac-Cadillac of EnidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  4. Norman v. Scrivner-Stevens Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  5. Beesley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Leonhard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  2. Neece v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  3. First Mortgage Company, LLC v. Strategic Mortgage Finance Group, LLC et al.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API