Legal Opinion
Proctor v. Plumer
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided April 27, 1897PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Appeal from Wayne; Donovan, J. Bill by Mary A. P. Proctor against Addie L. Plumer, the Flint & Pere Marquette Railroad Company, and others, to foreclose a land contract. From a decree dismissing the bill on demurrer, complainant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
On the 13th of April, 1891, complainant entered into a contract with Samuel A. Plumer, which reads as follows:
“For and in consideration of the sum of |1,000, to me in hand paid, I hereby agree to sell to Samuel A. Plumer, or his assigns, all that certain piece or parcel of land *395situate and being in the township of Springwells, county of Wayne, Michigan, on section 17, being about 30 acres of land on the southeast corner of the Chicago road and the Miller road, and being the piece of land marked ‘ Mary Proctor, 27.50,’ on the Springwells map in Wayne County Atlas of 1876; I hereby agree to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gault v. StormontMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Dickinson v. WrightMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Riopelle v. DoellnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Hanchett v. McQueenMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Curran v. RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ebert v. CullenMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Esper v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1902