Legal Opinion

Erickson v. Elliott

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1934No. 24968. Department OnePublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Main, J. —

This action was brought for the purpose of recovering rent due upon a written lease. The defendants denied liability, and, as an affirmative defense, pleaded constructive eviction. They also cross-complained for damages. The trial was to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings of fact from which the court concluded that the plaintiffs were entitled to recover rent in the sum of eight hundred dollars, and the defendants were entitled to damages in the sum of five hundred fifty dollars, to be offset against the rent. Judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiffs for the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wusthoff v. SchwartzWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Buerkli v. Alderwood FarmsWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  3. California Building Co. v. DruryWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. John B. Stevens & Co. v. PrattWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Thompson v. R. B. Realty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pague v. Petroleum Products, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Olson v. ScholesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  3. Old City Hall LLC v. Pierce County Aids FoundationCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  4. Cummings v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  5. 4ever Healing Llc And Saranjit Bassi v. Cct Construction Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API