Legal Opinion

Lodge v. Grubb

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided January 29, 1926PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The questions presented by the amended bill concern the disposition to be made of lapsed legacies. Some of the legacies given to particular individuals have lapsed by reason of the death of the legatees in the lifetime of the testatrix, and two of the legacies given by the general residuary clause have lapsed for the same reason.

Before the enactment of Section 3389, Revised Code 1915, the common law rule as to devises which have failed, prevailed in this State. That rule was that a lapsed devise goes to the heirs at law, a void one to the residuary devisee if there is one.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of Accounting of BensonNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Church v. ChurchSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1885
  3. Mabry v. . StaffordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  4. Taylor v. . LucasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1825

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Equitable Trust Co. v. Delaware Trust Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1948
  2. Burton v. MastenCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1931
  3. Bruno v. President of the Farmers BankCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1946
  4. Equitable Trust Co. v. BestCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1949
  5. Smith v. SavinCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API