Legal Opinion

Church v. Church

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided July 25, 1885PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Bill in Equity for partition.

1Opinion of the CourtDureee, C. J.

The question now before us for decision arises under the will of Samuel W. Church, late of Bristol, deceased. The will, after several specific devises and bequests for tbe benefit of tbe wife and daughters of the testator, concludes with the following residuary clause, to wit: “,I give, devise, and bequeath all the rest, residue, and remainder of my estate, real, personal, and mixed, wherever and however situate, of which I am now possessed, or may die seized or possessed, unto my sons, Samuel W. Church, Jun., Thomas Church, Benjamin Church, Hezekiah W. Church, James C. Church, and Charles…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stephens v. Van BurenNew York Court of Chancery · 1829
  2. Stedman v. PriestMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  3. Springer v. CongletonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1860
  4. Talcott v. TalcottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1872
  5. Warner's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1872

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Peck v. PeckWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. George Washington University v. Riggs Nat. Bank of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
  4. Industrial National Bank v. Glocester Manton Free Public LibrarySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1970
  5. R.I.H. Tr. Co. v. Swan Pt. C'm't'ry.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API