Legal Opinion

Gradney v. Polar Beverages

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 28, 2025No. 3:25-cv-02149Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 STACY GRADNEY, et al., Case No. 25-cv-02149-EMC 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S 9 v. MOTION TO DISMISS 10 POLAR BEVERAGES, Docket No. 17 11 Defendant. 12 13 14 Plaintiffs Stacy Gradney and Sharon Toll have brought a false advertising class action 15 against Defendant Polar Beverages (“Polar”). Polar sells a product, flavored seltzer water, that it 16 labels “100% Natural.” Plaintiffs assert that the “100% Natural” label is false because the product 17 actually contains synthetic ingredients. Now pending before…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Whittlestone, Inc. v. Handi-Craft Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Davidson v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API