Legal Opinion
Hilario v. Reardon
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided November 7, 2008No. 2007-390PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGalway, J.
The plaintiff, Jose Hilario, appeals an order of the Superior Court (Lynn, C.J.) dismissing his legal malpractice action against the defendant, Attorney Neil J. Reardon. We reverse and remand.
The following facts appear in the record. In 2004, the plaintiff was indicted in both Rockingham and Hillsborough Counties on various charges. He pled guilty to all charges, and sentences on two charges were suspended. On the remaining charges, the plaintiff entered into a plea agreement with the State which provided that if he met certain conditions, including cooperating in other prosecutions, the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Peeler v. Hughes & LuceTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Glenn v. AikenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Shaw v. State, Department of Administration, Public Defender AgencyAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Ang v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Rantz v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Soukup v. BrooksSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- David Skindzelewski v. Joseph Smith, Jr.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
- Gaylor v. JeffcoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- Kalil v. Town of Dummer Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- Ray J. Kraklio v. Kent SimmonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.