Legal Opinion
Soukup v. Brooks
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided June 12, 2009No. 2008-749PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.
The respondents, Robert and Kristine Brooks, appeal orders of the Superior Court (Bomstein and Burling, JJ.) granting summary judgment to the petitioners, William and Kathy Soukup, and denying summary judgment to the respondents, in this action to quiet title to property of the petitioners over which the respondents claim an easement. We reverse and remand.
The following facts were recited in the trial court’s orders or appear in the record. This case involves three contiguous properties, two in Lisbon and the third in Lyman (the Lyman lot). The first two properties have direct road access,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Pearson v. Virginia City Ranches Ass'nMontana Supreme Court · 2000
- Encarnacion v. ContigugliaNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Amoskeag Bank v. ChagnonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
- Patel v. Planning Board of North AndoverMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
- Hilario v. ReardonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Mansur v. MuskopfSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- Duxbury-Fox v. ShakhnovichSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- Thomas Ettinger & a. v. Pomeroy Limited Partnership & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
- Appletree Mall Associates, LLC v. Ravenna Investment AssociatesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- Austin v. SilverSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.