Legal Opinion

Ray J. Kraklio v. Kent Simmons

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 16, 2018No. 16-1392PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATERMAN, Justice.

This appeal presents the narrow question of whether the relief-required rule (also called the exoneration rule) applies to a convicted criminal suing one of his defense attorneys for legal malpractice over an alleged missed opportunity to shorten his period of supervised probation. This rule ordinarily requires proof the client had been exonerated from the underlying conviction. The defendant attorney was retained after the malpractice plaintiff was convicted and sentenced on three counts of welfare fraud and ordered to pay restitution. The attorney successfully obtained…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Krahn v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Stevens v. BisphamOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Wiley v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Shaw v. State, Department of AdministrationAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Trobaugh v. SondagSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dominic Clester v. State of IowaCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2019
  2. Donald Clark v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2021
  3. Donald Clark v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2021
  4. Michael McKee and Diane McKee v. City of Council Bluffs, IowaCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2022
  5. Scott R. Buss and Julie S. Buss v. Lana L. Luhring, individually and Lana Luhring d/b/a Laird & Luhring Law OfficeCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API