Legal Opinion

In re Adoption of M.B.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 2012No. 2011-0831PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Donnell, J.

{¶ 1} The Ninth District Court of Appeals certified two questions, which we agreed to review: one, its decision that monetary gifts from a biological parent to a minor child constitute maintenance and support for purposes of R.C. 3107.07(A) and thus trigger the requirement that parental consent is needed before the adoption of the child is approved — which it found conflicts "with In re Adoption of McCarthy, 6th Dist. No. L-91-199, 1992 WL 23175 (Jan. 17, 1992); and two, its decision that an appellate court should apply a de novo standard of review to a probate court’s decision regarding…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. State ex rel. Steele v. MorrisseyOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Rice v. CertainTeed Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Bolles v. Toledo Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1936
  5. In re Adoption of MasaOhio Supreme Court · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Caskey v. GanoOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State ex rel. Xenia v. Greene Cty. Bd. of Commrs. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  3. In re Adoption of B.I. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Snodgrass v. HarrisOhio Supreme Court · 2024
  5. State v. GloverOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API