In re Adoption of M.B.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Donnell, J.
{¶ 1} The Ninth District Court of Appeals certified two questions, which we agreed to review: one, its decision that monetary gifts from a biological parent to a minor child constitute maintenance and support for purposes of R.C. 3107.07(A) and thus trigger the requirement that parental consent is needed before the adoption of the child is approved — which it found conflicts "with In re Adoption of McCarthy, 6th Dist. No. L-91-199, 1992 WL 23175 (Jan. 17, 1992); and two, its decision that an appellate court should apply a de novo standard of review to a probate court’s decision regarding…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- State ex rel. Steele v. MorrisseyOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Rice v. CertainTeed Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1999
- Bolles v. Toledo Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1936
- In re Adoption of MasaOhio Supreme Court · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State ex rel. Caskey v. GanoOhio Supreme Court · 2013
- State ex rel. Xenia v. Greene Cty. Bd. of Commrs. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- In re Adoption of B.I. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
- Snodgrass v. HarrisOhio Supreme Court · 2024
- State v. GloverOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.