Legal Opinion

Southern Railway Co. v. Grizzle

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 14, 1932No. 21911PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.

1. Since the passage of the act of 1881 (Civil Code of 1910, § 4715), “the plaintiff in an action in a justice’s court must set forth, with some degree of certainty, a cause of action.” Macon & Birmingham, Ry. Co. v. Walton, 121 Ga. 275 (48 S. E. 940).

2. However, the niceties of pleadings are not required in a justice’s court. *429If the defendant is informed of the nature of the plaintiff’s demand against him, the requirement of the above section is met. Southern Railway Co. v. Collins, 118 Ga. 411 (45 S. E. 306) ; Southern Railway Co. v. Oliver, 1 Ga. App. 734 (2) (58 S. E. 244); Hendrix v.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. Oliver & MorrowCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. BarfieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  3. Macon & Birmingham Railway Co. v. WaltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. Kinney v. KinneyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  5. Hendrix v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  2. Furman v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API