Legal Opinion

Kinney v. Kinney

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 13, 1917No. 8813PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Certiorari; from Habersham superior court—Judge J. B. Jones. March 16, 1917.

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge, J.

1. Niceties in pleading are not required in a justice’s court. G. S. & F. Ry. Co. v. Barfield, 1 Ga. App. 203 (58 S. E. 236). Accordingly,' a liberal construction has been given section 4715 of the Civil Code (1910). If the defendant in a justice’s court is informed of the nature of the plaintiff’s demand against him, the requirement of the code-section is met. Hendrix v. Elliott, 2 Ga. App. 301 (2) (58 S. E. 495).

2. The cause of action attached to the summons in this case was a substantial compliance with the requirements of section 4715, supra, and was not subject to general demurrer on the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. BarfieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Marks & Powell v. Talmadge's Sons & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  3. Hendrix v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Douma v. PowersNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1920
  2. Adams Loan & Investment Co. v. Dolvin Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  3. Port Wentworth Lumber Co. v. McLeanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  4. Universal Match Corp. v. HendricksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  5. Ladd Lime & Stone Co. v. Case & CothranCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API