State Ex Rel. Crawford v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Dissent
OP ALA, J.,
with whom HODGES and WILSON, JJ., join, dissenting.
¶ 1 Today’s pronouncement declares that the trial court erred in allowing the terms of 36 O.S.1991 § 1928 B.41 to serve as the basis for depriving the reinsurer, The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America (Guardian), of its contractual-offset bargain because a) the invoked statutory provisions were not in force when the reinsurance contract was made and b) their interposition would imper-missibly impair the obligation of Guardian’s reinsurance contract. I cannot accede to the court’s view that the nisi prius judgment must be…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States Department of Treasury v. FabeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Veix v. Sixth Ward Building & Loan Assn. of NewarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Cumberland Glass Manufacturing Co. v. De Witt & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.