Postel v. Caruso
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
FAKE, Chief Judge.
The plaintiff herein moves for summary judgment after answer filed, and the defendant by cross motion seeks to have the complaint dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which a recovery may be had.
The complaint recites the necessary jurisdictional prerequisites and asserts that on February 15, 1947, plaintiff was 'hired by defendant partnership, C-Eight Laboratories, to act as sole sales agent of electrically operated cigarette vending machines within a limited number of states “for a period of one year from February 15, 1947.” That defendant agreed to furnish a minimum…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Frederick Hart & Co. v. Recordgraph CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Reynolds Metals Co. v. Metals Disintegrating Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
- Dennis v. Thermoid Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1942
- Reynolds Metals Co. v. Metals Disintegrating Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1948
- Passino v. Brady Brass Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dovberg v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
- Carney v. McGinnisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Dovberg v. Dow Chemical CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961