Legal Opinion

Fenstermaker v. Holman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1902No. 19,774PublishedCited by 23 opinions

From Grant Circuit Court; II. J. Paulus, Judge. Suit for partition by Martha J. Fenstermaker against Cortie Holman and others. From a decree for defendants, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

This cause having been transferred from the Appellate Court under the second clause of §10 of the act of 1901 (Acts 1901, p. 565, §1337] Burns 1901, §6565f Horner 1901) is here for final determination.

Samson Beeves died testate in 1879, leaving his widow, Sarah Ann Beeves, and his two daughters, Martha M. Fenstermaker and Cyrena Ann Holman, surviving. His. will was duly admitted to probate. After the death of the widow and the daughter Cyrena, each of whom died intestate, appellant brought this action against appellees, the children and heirs of said Cyrena, for partition of the real estate…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mulvane v. RudeIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Wood v. RobertsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Cleveland v. SpilmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Ross v. RossIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Moore v. GaryIndiana Supreme Court · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Pate v. BushongIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Hayes v. MartzIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Curry v. CurryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Nelson v. NelsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  5. Snodgrass v. BrandenburgIndiana Supreme Court · 1904

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API