Legal Opinion

Snodgrass v. Brandenburg

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1904No. 20,355PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Erom Shelby Circuit Court; Douglas Morris, Judge. Action by Napoleon B. Brandenburg against Dollie Snodgrass and others to quiet title. Erom a decree for plaintiff, defendants appeal. Transferred from the Appellate Court under §133Ju Burns 1901, Acts 1901,'p. 590.

1Opinion of the CourtGillett, J.

Appellee instituted this action against appellants to quiet title to certain real estate.- An answer and a cross-complaint were filed by appellants, both of which were adjudged insufficient on demurrer.

1. The pleadings present the question as to whether the duly probated will of William Snodgrass, deceased, gave to his widow, Sarah Snodgrass, a fee-simple title to his real estate. If so, the rulings mentioned were improper, and the cause should be reversed because of such rulings. The second, third and fourth clauses of said will afford a sufficient understanding as to the character of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mulvane v. RudeIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Fenstermaker v. HolmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Lumpkin v. RodgersIndiana Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Myers v. CarneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Hayes v. MartzIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Curry v. CurryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Martin v. RaffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1944
  5. Reeder v. AntrimIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API