Legal Opinion

Pate v. Bushong

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1903No. 20,254PublishedCited by 35 opinions

From Henry Circuit Court; W. O. Barnard, Judge. Suit by Abraham Pate and others against Peter P. Bushong. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiffs appeal. Transferred from Appellate Court, under §1337u Burns 1901.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

— Jackson Bushong died testate in Henry county, Indiana, in 1898, leaving his widow, Lydia Bushong, his son Peter P. Bushong (the appellee), and his five grandchildren, Minerva A. Pate, Phoebe T. Thompson, Hannah N. Addison, Cora C. Warrington, and Lila L. Ellison, children of a deceased daughter of the testator. Said will was legally probated. After the death of said widow, appellants brought this action against appellee for partition of the lands devised to the widow, upon the theory that she took the same in fee simple under said will.

The will, omitting the codicil which is not necessary…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Patch v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Woman's Union Missionary Society of America v. MeadIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Decker v. DeckerIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Daugherty v. RogersIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Du Bois v. RayNew York Court of Appeals · 1866

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Skinner v. SpannIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Warner v. MarshallIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Taylor v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Hayes v. MartzIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Collins v. CappsIllinois Supreme Court · 1908

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API