Legal Opinion

Lauderdale v. Eugene Water & Electric Board

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 30, 2008No. 160320319, A128046PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

In 1990, 2003, and 2004, the Eugene Water and Electric Board (EWEB) increased the amount that it required its retired employees to contribute to the cost of their company-sponsored retiree health care benefits and that current employees would have to contribute for those benefits when they retired. Shortly after the last increase, plaintiffs — five retired employees, the widow of a retired employee, and a then-current employee anticipating retirement — brought this action, alleging that the increase in cost amounted to a breach of contract and seeking specific performance of the original,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hughes v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Oregon State Police Officers' Ass'n v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Taylor v. Multnomah County Deputy Sheriff's Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Harryman v. Roseburg Rural Fire Protection DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  5. McHorse v. Portland General Electric CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1974

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Watkins v. Josephine CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  2. Funkhouser v. WELLS FARGO CORP.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. James v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. Republic Services Procurement Incorporated v. PeopleReady IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API