Legal Opinion
Witters v. Sowles
United States Circuit Court
Decided May 2, 1887PublishedCited by 4 opinions
In Equity.
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.
Since the decision, and before entry of the decree in this cause, the defendant Burton has moved, on the affidavits of himself, Albert Sowles, D. Noyes Burton, and Albert P. Cross, for leave to take further testimony upon the question of his assent to the loan of $36,000 to Edward A. Sowles, for the loss upon which a decree has been directed to be entered charging him and Albert Sowles.
There were two boards of directors from January 13 to Februaiy 11, 1880, each claiming to be the rightful board, both of which included Albert Sowles and one other, and one of them Edward A. Sowles and Burton.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Livingston v. HubbsNew York Court of Chancery · 1817
- Hitchcock v. TremaineU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1872
- Ruggles v. EddyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1874
- De Florez v. RaynoldsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1879
- India Rubber Comb Co. v. PhelpsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1870
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Mifflin Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Sheridan v. RothensiesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Hector Muro Carrillo v. Nancy A. BerryhillDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2020
- Yolanda G v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2026