Legal Opinion

De Florez v. Raynolds

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided June 9, 1879PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In equity.

1Opinion of the Court

BLATCHFORD, Circuit Judge.

The bill in this case was filed in May, 1875. It named as defendants Charles T. Raynolds, Thomas B. Hidden, Leonard Richardson and Edward L. Molineux, as members of and composing the firm of C. T. Raynolds & Co. In August, 1875, Aquila Rich was added as a defendant, as a member of said firm. In June, 1875, the four defendants oviginal'y made such put in an answer to the bill, which set forth that Rich was a member of the firm. The answer was sworn to by the defendant Richardson, and the name of George F. Martens was appended to it as attorney for the defendants,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Livingston v. HubbsNew York Court of Chancery · 1817
  2. De Florez v. RaynoldsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1880

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh Reduction Co. v. Cowles Electric Smelting & Aluminum Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1894
  2. Moneyweight Scale Co. v. Toledo Computing Scale Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1912
  3. Witters v. SowlesUnited States Circuit Court · 1887
  4. Austin v. RileyU.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Iowa · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API