Legal Opinion

Miller v. Lighter

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1963PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The question presented is whether appellants are properly before this court. A person may be a “party aggrieved” by a judgment or order and entitled to appeal under sec. 274.10, Stats., even though he is not a named party in the suit. Paradise v. Ridenour (1933), 211 Wis. 42, 247 N. W. 472. Generally where the aggrieved party is not a named party to the action he nevertheless has a substantial interest adverse to the judgment either directly or by privity created by succeeding to the rights of the person against whom the judgment was rendered. We recognized in Gumz v. Chickering (1963), 19…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lamont v. Hibbard, Spencer, Bartlett & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Paradise v. RidenourWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
  2. Lueck's Home Improvement, Inc. v. Seal Tite National, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
  3. Falk v. Falk CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1975
  4. Lueck's Home Improvement, Inc. v. Seal Tite National, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
  5. v. Camel Point RanchColorado Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API