Legal Opinion

Paradise v. Ridenour

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

The defendant Ridenour was not a party to the action but was brought in under the provisions of ch. 273, Stats., entitled “Remedies Supplementary to Execution.” Under that chapter a judgment debtor may be compelled to answer as to his property either by summons or by a warrant of arrest. When the judgment debtor appears he may be examined upon oath and witnesses may be required to appear and testify as upon the trial of an issue.

By sec. 273.08 it is provided:

“The judge may order any property of the judgment debtor in the hands either of himself or any other person or due to the judgment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harrigan v. GilchristWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Hammond-Chandler Lumber Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Hinn v. GerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miller v. LighterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Nick v. HoltzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Department of Revenue v. Milwaukee MacK Sales, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API